kazimahmood
UX/UI Designer at - Adobe
Tun Mahathir Mohamad once again demonstrated a lack of seriousness in his attacks against PM Anwar Ibrahim by quoting Wikipedia as a source. He attempted to link Anwar with alleged hidden funds in Israeli banks, supposedly belonging to the PM.
However, Wikipedia is not a reputable source of information for whistleblowers. Serious whistleblowers would not post sensitive information on the platform to accuse a political or business leader. While Wikipedia has standards in place to flag posts that lack references and evidence, it may not remove them immediately, as it waits for someone to come and add value to the story.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, which means the information presented can be both accurate and inaccurate. It is essential to consider that some articles may not undergo rigorous fact-checking or peer review, leading to potential inaccuracies or bias. While Wikipedia can be a helpful starting point for research, it is crucial to cross-check information with more reliable sources before forming an opinion or making decisions based on the content.
Despite the questionable credibility of the source, the video from Twitter is gaining traction among non-PH followers. Mahathir has urged the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to investigate the matter. As the saying goes, desperate times call for desperate measures.
In conclusion, people should not trust everything on Wikipedia without verifying the information with more reputable sources. While it can be a useful tool for gaining general knowledge, it is essential to approach the content with a critical mindset and seek additional reliable sources to confirm any claims or allegations.
PAS Failing In Their Own Strategy
Netizens highlight the irony of the opposition pointing out problems within the coalition government while overlooking their own issues
